This Thursday there was controversy at the University of Chile after the coach, Rafael Dudamel, acknowledged that he organized a meeting at his home with the coaching staff and some players from the U. Nothing social, all for work purposes and apparently one entered when another left, but in the same way the DT broke health protocols, also considering quarantine.
“Dudamel’s explanations don’t help at all, he says it was informative… you can send an email or you can do a Zoom. It doesn’t make any sense, less with the outbreak they had. It is as if he believes that things are flexible in biological matters “he said bluntly Juan Cristobal Guarello on Radio DNA.
Guarello added that “As it is a work meeting and not a social one, then there are no contagions, and also with the antecedent of the U, which is left out of Copa Libertadores, in large part, due to the mismanagement of the internal protocol. And football is in the pipeline. If the protagonists do not respect their activity that remains for, rest. Dudamel’s explanation has no substance or meaning “.
For his part Danilo Diaz stated that it was “An imprudence understanding the current situation in the country and the problems that football has, illustrated in Curicó’s match with La Serena and also the U itself before facing San Lorenzo. Regardless of what it may entail, we understand that for now there is no complaint to the health authority, but it must be established if this was gradual, one or two players at a time, or if there was a crash, because it is different. There is an infraction, but gradually “.
“It is reckless at the moment that the country is living and also the sporting situation that the U and Rafael Dudamel are going through. The team does not play well and since its arrival it is not a U that is pleasant to see or attractive. He gets into one more problem “he added.
By last Luke Tudor took the floor with an angry tone: “It was bad at a very difficult time, the most difficult with the number of cases and new strains. With the sensitivity of the subject, it seems to me an important lack of criteria, I am nobody to judge errors, we all made mistakes and he offered apologies, but clearly it is a lack of criteria “.
Sentence that “These things about four players are discussed together, because each player has something to do with the movements of the other, but it seems wrong to me and there is no other reading”.
